EQUITIES: are American banks a concern?

QUESTION:  Property is in a hole, interest rates are going up and we have crazies in control (or not in control) of parts of the US government, so are you concerned about US banks?

ANSWER: Yes.

Maintaining bank stock multiples is about confidence and there is a lot to be concerned about in the US:

  • recent political activity (border and military bills) suggests that Republicans would now generate a real crisis if it damaged the Democrats’ prospects in this year’s elections, and causing a debt crisis is the biggest possible crisis (although some think it would blow back on the Republicans);
  • interest rates aren’t going down, and likely to go up, this year due to low unemployment and higher inflation;
  • property defaults are going to happen;
  • the US government needs to get debt levels down and it isn’t going to happen without structural reforms; and, finally,
  • unlike most banks in OECD countries, the US runs theirs on socialist principles with respect to house mortgages but free-enterprise principles for bank executive remuneration, and this creates a moral hazard that eventually governments will not want to continue funding!

The bottom line is that US banks will need more capital over time.   Although some US banks are better than others, it is difficult to justify any except Morgan Stanley.

Contact TurnerStreet if you wish to buy our current asset allocation recommendation (we do cash and equity only allocations for our wholesale clients), and the list of the stocks TurnerStreet would buy for a typical wholesale client, or if you would like TurnerStreet to manage your equities and derivatives portfolio.

IMPORTANT: This Q&A is general product advice for wholesale or sophisticated investors, and NOT suitable for retail investors.  Retail investors should seek advice specific to their circumstances and not rely upon general product advice written for other types of investors.  Retail investors acting like wholesale/sophisticated investor are likely to experience inappropriate and/or excessive risk for their circumstances, and unacceptable losses.

AA: debt default by the US government?

QUESTION: is a debt default by the US government likely?  If so, what to do about it?

ANSWER: Probably, yes, so “risk-off.”

For a long time, I thought the Republican leadership in the US congress were crazy, but not so crazy to default on the government debt.  However, when I consider how the crazies, and their supporters are now rationalising the January 6 US Capital attack suggesting pardons, et cetera, it isn’t obvious to me that debt default would be off the table.  Why?  Damaging the Biden administration and winning the MAGA supporters is the aim of Republicans and compared to invading the US Capital and the attempted insurrection, defaulting on debt is trivial.

The less likely alternative to default is massive upheaval by pushing all the way to the edge of default which will leave markets thinking it might just be next time.

The least likely outcome is the Republicans say sorry, and just do what every previous congress has done and increased the debt ceiling.

The solution for investment managers is go “risk-off” at least until we know whether default occurs in the next couple of weeks because even if it doesn’t, there isn’t a likely bounce for the reason outlined above and the general valuation of stocks.

However, even if you go risk off and the US government defaults, you might still have a problem depending where you put your money.  What is considered going to cash is often exposure to 4-week US Treasury Bills: see most broker cash accounts; money market funds; “narrow” banks, etc.

DISCLOSURE: TurnerStreet Advisors went risk-off and into cash on 19 May 2023.